look at herbicide plots and tillage comparisons.
This year we have a sub-irrigation tile irrigation study that should be very informative,” he adds.
The article refers to a sub-irrigation system that probably uses principles very similar to these using corrugated drain pipe. There are a couple of interesting points about this event.
If sub-irrigation is a good system for commercial growers, why isn't it a good system for home gardeners? Notice also that they don’t refer to sub-irrigation by the inaccurate and highly misleading term "self-watering".
I'm finding many articles in the current news about urban farming. It is a minor media rage. Just about all of what I read is about dirt farming in the city.
Due to the dumbing down of our education system regarding the use of modern technology, journalists, politicians and foodie activists know only about digging in the dirt. That was appropriate to the time we were a rural economy in prior centuries. We no longer are and it’s time to recognize that. Victory Gardens and community dirt gardens are WWII and yesterday.
Of course there's a place for in-ground growing in the city but to rely on it exclusively in the built environment is sheer folly. There is a major role for sub-irrigation planter systems (SIPs), micro-gardening, simplified hydroponics, aeroponics and aquaponics. Our education system, however, only teaches consumers about tilling dirt. This isn’t Cuba.
Continue reading "Sub-irrigation: Good For Farmers But Not For Home Gardeners?" »
