This CEO leads a tour of his LEED rated green hotel demonstrating solar panels, waterless urinals, low flush toilets, low flow faucets, low VOC materials …but no green plants in sight.
How did we arrive at the situation where a green building may or may not have green plants? If it does have plants, they likely did not add any points to the LEED rating.
What if there was a sub-irrigated grow box vegetable garden on the roof. You can't get any more local than fresh food on the roof. Would an edible roof garden add LEED credits to a building?
In my view, this is an absurd situation and reflects once again on our weak horticultural education. Educators are still preaching arcane drench and drain watering methods that are hardly green. The practices they encourage are from the dark ages.
There is little question however, that sub-irrigated plants are green. They can help clean the air and make buildings more livable while saving water. Dr. Bill Wolverton's NASA research demonstrated this.
Sub-irrigated plants also require significantly less maintenance by reducing the number of plant care service visits. This reduces vehicle use and saves gas.
It is a puzzle why the interior plantscaping industry is not publicizing the green business practices that many (but not all) of its members use. That would help immensely in convincing the Green Building Council to include points for plants in the LEED rating system.
It is important to understand that green plants by themselves are not necessarily green. It depends on how they are maintained.









How Green is Your Future Home?
See the cut Calla Lily
If you think a green home includes living indoor plants, guess again. Watch both of these videos about the Smart Home exhibition at The Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago.
You will see that there are no plants visible in this version of a "smart" home. There is, however, a vase with a cut Calla Lily. Is this supposed to be an example of a sustainable green plant?
Note that both the Museum president and Smart Home architect have a living plant close by them.
As previously posted, an in-ground garden is a part of the Smart Home. In what appears to be an afterthought, there are EarthBoxes on the entrance stairs to the museum.
UPDATE 2009: It is really a smart home now. There are now EarthBoxes on the upper deck of the Smart Home. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong but I believe this would not have happened without The Growing Connection, a UN organization stepping forward.
This Smart Home could have been a wonderful demonstration of 21st century edible and decorative greenscaping using modern sub-irrigation methods. The technology is here now but poorly understood.
Incidentally, I also noted that “high-tech” clay pots and saucers from Botanicalls are included in the exhibit inside the museum. How green is that? Hardly!
We have a long way to go.
Posted by Greenscaper on July 28, 2008 at 03:57 PM in Container Gardening, Editorial Comment, Education, Green Buildings, Indoor Plants, SIPs: Sub-irrigation aka self-watering, Urban Agriculture | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)